Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley, 88-1688 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 88-1688 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 28, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 842 F.2d 217 Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Harol WHITLEY, et al., Respondents/Appellees. No. 88-1688. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Order Feb. 29, 1988. Dissent March 7, 1988. Order March 28, 1988. Before ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988. ORDER 2 A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal. 3 The parties are
More

842 F.2d 217

Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner/Appellant,
v.
Harol WHITLEY, et al., Respondents/Appellees.

No. 88-1688.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Order Feb. 29, 1988.
Dissent March 7, 1988.
Order March 28, 1988.

Before ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988.

ORDER

2

A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal.

3

The parties are directed to file simultaneous briefs within 28 days; within 14 days thereafter the parties may file simultaneous responses.

4

Circuit Judge CHAMBERS dissents from this order and will file a separate expression of his views.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

5

My dissent on our Court's order for briefs is that I think we had such splendid oral presentations on February 29 that I think we have enough in the record to decide the issues before us without the briefing that was ordered.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer